KONFLIK KEWENANGAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP YANG DI LAKUKAN KOORPORASI

Authors

  • Boy Anggara Universitas Langlangbuana Author
  • Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja Universitas Langlangbuana Author
  • Syahrul Machmud Universitas Langlangbuana Author

Keywords:

Authority, Investigator, the environment

Abstract

The application of environmental criminal law is currently not optimal due to the absence of synchronization, or alignment, both structurally, substantially and culturally, in the criminal justice system from the police, prosecutors, courts and correctional institutions. The repetition of environmental crimes  by individual and corporate legal subjects proves that there is disharmony between POLRI and PPNS investigators in tackling environmental crimes. This study aims to analyze how to resolve the conflict of investigation authority between Indonesian Police investigators and PNS investigators in enforcing environmental criminal law and how to harmonize the conflict of authority between POLRI investigators and PPNS. Normative juridical research methods or legal research libraries, sources of data used secondary data  legal materials. The results of the analysis in this study indicate,  the regulation of PPNS authority in environmental crimes is not in accordance with the criminal justice system based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis, the Criminal Procedure Code as a generalist and Law no. 32 of 2009 is the lex specialis of environmental crimes when the submission of the results of the investigation must go through the POLRI investigators. Meanwhile, the authority of POLRI investigators in Law Number 32 year 2009 is not clearly regulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja at all, (2020) Environmental Performance: Role of Green employee involvement practices, Green Training and Green Shared Vision, Journal Of Security and Sustainability Issues.(Q2)ISSN 2029-7017 / ISSN 2029-7025 (Online) 2020 Volume 10 Number 2 .http://www.tb.lt/Leidiniai/SSI/10-2/10_2_28.pdf URL Indexing Jurnal:https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.10.2 (28)

Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perpektif Teoritik Dan Praktik Peradilan. Bandung, Mandar Maju.

Muladi, (1995) Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Semarang, Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Romli Atmasasmita, (2006) Sistem peradilan pidana : perspektif eksistensialisme dan abolisionisme, Bandung, Bina Cipta.

Syahrul Machmud,(2011)), Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (Penegakan Hukum Administrasi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana menurut UU No. 32 , Bandung, Graha Ilmu.

T. Subarsyah , (2020), Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Lingkungan Sungai Citarum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice, Jurnal Soshum Insentif, Vol. 3 No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36787/jsi.v3i2.264.

Yahya Harahap, (2010), Pembahasan, Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan). Jakarta, Sinar Grafika

Yesmil Anwar dan Adang,(2009), Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Konsep Komponen, Dan Pelaksanaannnya Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia). Bandung, Widya Padjadjaran.

Published

30-12-2022

How to Cite

Anggara, B., Rosidawati Wiradirja, I. ., & Machmud, S. (2022). KONFLIK KEWENANGAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP YANG DI LAKUKAN KOORPORASI. Iustitia Omnibus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 1-8. http://jurnal-pasca.unla.ac.id/index.php/iustitiaomnibus/article/view/63